The NitPicker’s Guide to the Lord of the Rings. Eighty-one points whereby the Jackson film differs from holy writ.
More Am Trek
Star Trek: New Voyages is an amateur Star Trek series not dissimilar from Starship Exeter. New Voyages‘ primary refinement is that the shows are set on board the Enterprise of the original series as opposed to a contemporary ship of the same class, as is the case with Exeter. New Voyages also employs the same characters: Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and so forth have simply been recast, and as the script makes clear, the events seen in New Voyages are intended to take place ‘in canon,’ if you will.
New Voyages looks like it has a larger operating budget than Exeter, and I thought the first episode, “What May Come,” (described as a pilot on the website) seems to employ some more experienced actors than those in the Johnsons’ labor of love.
It was a bit tough to download the episode, also. I ended up getting it from here. The site doesn’t explain the format, but the zip files are crisp-looking 240×320 (I think) .wmvs, playable on the Mac with the excellent MPlayer OS X. Alas, there’s no easy way to got from .wmv to DVD on the Mac, so you may be stuck watching the show on your monitor rather than on the tube.
I have written before about how this emerging genre fascinates me. New Voyages is particularly intriguing because of the close ties to the original show – two actors that appeared on the original series do guest shots, and a Trek fan muckety-muck who sold a story to Voyager also appears.
Overall good points include persuasive costuming, a variety of room sets including what appear to be complete bridge and transporter room sets, and some really good looking effects shots, all scrupulously employing designs drawn from the mid-seventies Starfleet Technical Manual.
New Voyages FAQ notes that producer James Cawley is a Trekanalia collector, and that the production shot in New York, facts that lead me to conclude that Cawley is the collector who purchased the DS9-built recreation of the TOS bridge set built for use on the DS9 time travel episode that placed Sisko and crew aboard the Enterprise during the events seen in TOS episode “The Trouble with Tribbles.”
Jimm and Josh Johnson of Exeter have told me they met with this collector in upstate New York to explore continuing their series on his sets but did not pursue the opportunity because it was geographically inconvenient for their cast and crew.
New Voyages FAQ also notes that Sulu doen not appear in the recast crew, ‘for good reason,’ which leads me to speculate that George Takei may appear in an upcoming episde, given his awareness of and involvement with the fan push to get Paramount to make Excelsior the next Trek to follow Voyager.
Naturally, there are some quibbles. The effects shots mix the textural look of the series’ movie effects with the cleaner surfaces of the original television series, which looks odd. The audio of all the interior shots is roomy; that is, there’s a clear acoustic reverb which comes from iimproper miking. The editing and pacing are – with the exception of the effects sequences – overly loose, leaving the whole production with a disctinct amateur feel; this is also a problem in the careless, busy use of soundtrack music as well. This overall slightly undisciplined sense is most obvious when the director violates TOS editing conventions in several places. This disrupts the desired effect of creating the illusion that one is watching a forgotten production from the time and place of the original series.
I am driven to comment on the visual failure of “Kirk’s” hair. It’s not even close to Shatner’s Kirk ‘do. Instead it looks like Elvis’ hair, long, square sideburns and all. Since the odd ‘Vanilla Ice’ image of the actor on the main page for the production clearly shows pointy sideburns, I assume that the square burns must be a reference to the square burns worn by Bill in the original series pilot “Whom Gods Destroy.”
In conclusion, I didn’t get the same giddy charge from seeing this as I did from seeing Exeter, but by the same token I saw nothing to indicate that the production couldn’t be tightened up. Given that both series are continuing production, I can imagine a very interesting set of scenarios between the two groups, from competition to cross-over. I also have a hard time imagining that Paramount is going to ignore or encourage this, as much as I believe it’s what they should do. On the other hand, the Paramount logo appears on the website, so maybe I’m mistaken.
Imagine if they took the budget for one episode of the current series, and distributed it to ten amateur efforts in the form of grants as a kind of farm system. In one fell swoop they’d get distribution rights to the fan material, reconnect with the fan base, and establish a modern, post-digital era production and distribution cycle to learn from and draw on. I’m not holding my breath.
Of course, this sort of thing always leads me to wonder where the fan series production of Space: 1999 might be.
A Handsome Walk
Last night Spence and I went to the Tractor Tavern to see old acquaintances of Spence’s, the entirely brilliant (in the American sense of ‘genuinely original and deep’) The Handsome Family. The band is a husband-and-wife songwriting team; they perform original music that is deeply grounded in American traditions and which benefits from the rich baritone of the singer’s voice. Viv had originally planned to attend a different show at the Croc, Visqueen, but decided to stay home instead.
Scott McCaughey and a Vancouver band, ‘The Buttless Chaps,’ opened, but I was there for the headliners. A couple friends met us there. I ran into an old friend there as well. Some grumpy gus was pissed that Katie and I (and then Spencer and I) were gabbing during the set, and although I was irritated by him, I couldn’t be mad at the guy – the music demands reverence.
After the show I started talking to Brett Sparks, the lead singer, about the old-skool clamshell iBook they used to provide accompaniment for the entire performance. The iBook was running iTunes with a list of backing tracks and one-minute silent tracks between the backing tracks. I floated a possibility about a piece looking at the couple’s use of Macs in their creative and performance process, and he was quite open to the idea. He told me that the backing tracks had all been developed in ProTools. We started talking about the roots of their music (they opened the set with a song about a bottomless pit, which reminded me of the myth of Orpheus).
Brett’s wife Rennie is the lyricist; he mentioned that she is working on a novel, which sound interesting to me because I find their music so interesting and rewarding. We talked about the great age of much of the material that they work from. Their work reflective and literary in the sense that the work has a great deal of possibility for personal reflection and the discovery of tangential meanings built into it.
Then Spence and I ate at IHOP in the University District (bottomless coffee, endless pancakes) and had a long conversation about, like, you know, life and stuff, as traditionally appropriate to late-night dining.
Alas, the buses don’t run between the U and the Hill after about 3:00 am, so I walked home. It took about an hour and a half. I arrived a bit after 5, having taken a pit stop at the wonderful neighborhood bookstore Twice Sold Tales and wandered around looking for a nice hardback copy of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island, which I’m reading on my Palm
Pilot. They had one, but it was overpriced at $18. I’ve been struck by the perfection of Stevenson’s prose, which begs to be read aloud.
While I was there, they were playing old Kinks, and so at 5 am, as the sky pinked up a tiny bit, I had the pleasure of hearing ‘Waterloo Sunset’ just before I walked back in to the chilly chilly morning breeze.
Terror Alert Banana
Audio-stream capturing
Eric descibes how he’s been ripping John Peel to disc for later listening on iPod using the interesting multi-format capable MusicSafari.
In the past, I’ve used Ambrosia’s WireTap, which is free.
Mac hat trick: Scripting iChat
iChat Knows Where I Am, blogs EIC Jason Snell at Macworld. He’s whipped up a mildly kludgy AppleScript to set iChat’s broadcast indicator status to recognize his current location, either ‘at the office’ or ‘at home.’
Hm. This doesn’t directly apply to my needs right now, but it’s an interesting idea… I like the idea of status indicators available to good friends and family. In my case, something like ‘vacuuming,’ ‘washing dishes,’ ‘doing laundry,’ ‘jobhunting,’ and the like might be cool. Not that I have any idea how to automate that.
Tangentially: look! blogs at Macworld! Looks like Jason has been at it since January 20, and Mac 911 dude Chris Breen has been going since December.
Speaking of Steve Jobs
Pixar Sees End to Its Disney Partnership [NYT]. Well. Someone’s clearly lost their marbles. I recall seeing joking speculation that Apple would buy Disney if something like this came to pass… I’m sure the next few weeks will have some entertaining developments. I wonder, does this imply that Jobs has been spending a great deal of time paying attention to Pixar at the expense of Apple, thus the less-than-compelling product intros at Macworld earlier this month?
Macs at Microsoft
The Mac lovers of Microsoft: these ones haven’t been fired.
Kidding, Mac BU! This P-I story looks at the people that make software for Macs up Redmond way. It’s by Todd Bishop, who I’ve linked to far too much this week.
iSight info and research
I recently sprang for an iSight, sold on it by a demo conducted by Eric. The product itself is a classic Apple widget; the very experience of opening the packaging is satisfying.
Alas, a bit more time spent with the product reveals some shortcomings.
- The default video chat application, iChat AV, is not cross-platform, limiting the user base. I do wish to note that the ease of use and quality of signal for iChat AV is astonishing.
- The iSight’s default video settings are not well suited for low-light situations (such as my desk area).
- The iSight’s video settings are not adjustable from within a stock install of iChat AV. Frustratingly, they are readily available in a range of other software applications, including Apple’s own Quicktime Broadcaster. You can brighten the image and fix the color balance, but the settings will not be saved when you switch over to iChat AV.
- The three clear acrylic mounts that come with the camera are of limited utility, being very specifically designed to meet mounting requirements for current Apple products.
- iChat AV does not ship with the camera, but rather is available either as a bundle with OS X 10.3 or as a standalone application available via $30 purchase only.
- The lack of a large installed user base makes searching for reliable solutions to these irritations quite time consuming.
Fortunately, all of these shortcomings are addressable, with the exception of the unbundled iChat AV. Formerly, Apple offered a demo version that operated on older systems. That demo expired on January 15, and there’s a storm of controversy on Apple’s support boards about the already-premium priced camera coming without the basic software required to use it. Judging by Apple’s previous solutions to this sort of thing, I would be unsurprised if Apple decided to make iChat AV available online to registered iSight owners for free, sometime soon.
There are a few third-party mounts available (the SightFlex looks particularly cool) for the camera, and of course many hacks to improve the flexibility of the stands as shipped.
Personally, I built a little box-like shelf out of cardboard and velcro to attach to the front lower bezel of my monitor. Eventually I’ll refine it a bit and publish plans and instructions here.
A third-party program called iChatUSBCam ($9 online only) enables fine-tuning of the video image in iChat – and, more importantly, I think, enables USB-based web-cams and video-inputs to operate with iChat AV, which otherwise only accepts firewire video input. Considering that the iSight – and other firewire-enabled video solutions – generally go for well over $100, while USB web-cams can be picked up for a song, interested parties might wish to pursue this route as an alternative to obtaining the iSight proper.
So that brings us to the toughest problem, the lack of cross-platform opportunities for iChat AV. A well-informed friend notes that given Apple and AIM’s partnership, now that AOL is not embargoed from producing a video-chat application, we should expect to see an interoperable video-conferencing application in the next release of AIM for Windows, and possibly in AIM for the Mac, if such a product is being maintained.
But what about right now?
There appear to be three options. Two are dual-platform video chat applications, iVisit and iSpQ. I noted messages from users of both applications noting that they functioned, and messages from users of both applications discussing the difficulty of setting the applications up.
A third option explicitly supports not only cross-platform video-conferencing but video-conferencing with users of NetMeeting, Microsoft’s video-conferencing application. What prodigy is this?
It’s the in-development open source project XMeeting. The application looks like it might be even harder to configure and set up for non-technical people than the two mentioned above, but the Holy Grail – interoperability with the de facto business standard – might make it worth swimming upstream for.
in dreams
I woke up this morning after an epic dream all about a very detailed experience of insomnia.