Dog on chair

I’ve been trying to do and post a digital drawing a day for a few days. Naturally, I forgot about the advisability of posting said pix to the blog. So here they come.

keTT.jpg

The end of Google

Andy Baio writes about the rolling changes in Google’s online services with special attention to the discontinuation of the plus operator.

As these changes have rolled out I have noticed that many of my basic intact ions with Google have become broken, in one way or another. The UI changes, for example, inevitably increase latency between click and input-acceptance and privilege secondary UI input elements over direct input – the best example I can think of is the changes in Google Documents to titling or retitling.

Previously, one simply clicked on the area of the displayed page where the title was and entered the new title or changes as needed. There was not a visual cue that this was possible and a submit button never appeared. Simply clicking on the title area changed the title area to a text input box.

Now, when one clicks in the title area, a secondary UI element pops up, in the center of the screen, with a bordered input box and a submit button. This pop up is accompanied by the telltale flickering of way, way too many CSS redraws. When one completes entry one may dismiss the dialog by hitting enter or by clicking on the button. I cannot recall if the dialog instantiates with the cursor active in the input box or not.

At any rate, the effect if the pop up is to lead the user to move the mouse over the new dialog, click, type, and click again. All told the user is now directed to move the cursor to the title area, click, move the cursor to the center of the screen, click, type, click again, and then return the cursor to the location in the document or interface where the next action is to be pursued.

The previous methodology required two motions and one click.

Clearly, Google is finished as a force for innovation and sanity in the world. Their lunch is sitting unattended on the counter. I invite someone to eat it.

Crimes in Southern Indiana

(I expect that I will post this on my own blog as well. I use the formal “Mr.” convention here for reasons I hope are obvious.)

A few weeks ago I noticed a flutter in the twittersphere concerning a just-released book, Frank Bill’s Crimes in Southern Indiana.

(Mr. Bill maintains an active blog at Frank Bill’s House of Grit.)

Preveiwers were generally excited about the book, and reviewers have also been kind. Here’s part of the publisher’s blurb:

Welcome to heartland America circa right about now, when the union jobs and family farms that kept the white on the picket fences have given way to meth labs, backwoods gunrunners, and bare-knuckle brawling.

Bill’s people are pressed to the brink–and beyond. There is Scoot McCutchen, whose beloved wife falls terminally ill, leaving him with nothing to live for–which doesn’t quite explain why he brutally murders her and her doctor and flees, or why, after years of running, he decides to turn himself in. In the title story, a man who has devolved from breeding hounds for hunting to training them for dog-fighting crosses paths with a Salvadoran gangbanger tasked with taking over the rural drug trade, but who mostly wants to grow old in peace. As Crimes in Sourthern Indiana unfolds, we witness the unspeakable, yet are compelled to find sympathy for the depraved.

Honestly, how could I not read this book? I already see the hilly forested hills of my native land as a heart of darkness. Here is someone looking to write that myth in the form of pop fiction. I tweeted about it, think I mentioned it on Facebook, thought I had mentioned it here. That last, I never did. I am remedying that right now.

Bill Zink, a faithful correspondent and sharp critical mind, followed up on my lead and read the book and posted about reading it on his blog, The Death of Everything. He took as his starting place Mr. Bill’s use of music in the book, and noted that the specific artists cited – Cash’s “Folsom Prison Blues” in one scene and Dock Boggs’ “O Death” in another – took him out of the narrative because it was improbable that these specific pieces of music would have been easily available as broadcast or ambient sound in the time and place of the narrative.

The Cash is cited in a tavern just before a fight breaks out and here I’ll disagree with Mr. Zink: that cut has been on jukeboxes since it was released, and Mr. Bill places his stories in time dispersed from the postwar ear to what appears to be the present day. The other citation, “O, Death,” I recall as described as coming from a radio as well, and here I concur with Mr. Zink in his critique of the song as unrealistic.

There’s one other reference to music in the book. A supporting character is described as wearing a worn Drive-By Truckers tee shirt. Here again, that is a reference beyond the probable horizon of the character in question.

I’m pretty sure these three referents are intended both as scene-setting for the audience and as signposts to some of Mr. Bill’s influences. Additionally, the use of period-and-setting inappropriate music in the context of a film is a useful and effective technique to add atmosphere and expand the referents of a scene. The bar fight in Kathryn Bigelow’s wonderful Near Dark, for instance, is set to the Cramps’ “Fever.” The viewer imputes the tune as coming from the jukebox, and in 1987 backwoods bars definitely did NOT have cuts by the Cramps on the jukebox.

I don’t feel like I need to expand on why someone with an interest in writing backwoods noir would be interested in the work of Johnny Cash or the Drive-By Truckers, and I probably don’t need to explore the use of Dock Boggs either, but that last one is a thread worth expanding anyway. I would also venture that the films “The Dancing Outlaw” and “The Wild and Wonderful Whites” are also influences.

The book is a collection of short stories set mostly in far Southern Indiana, along the northern bank of the Ohio. The stories overlap in characters and setting and occasionally in narrative events. Without a detailed knowledge of the original publication order of the stories, my own sense is that the book presents them in roughly the order of creation. The very first story cycle concerns a blood feud between two hillbilly outlaw families and the prose is florid. My impression was that the language in these three stories reflected a young writer and could have benefitted from more-rigorous editing. In particular some repetitions in the prose did not appear to me to serve a clear aesthetic purpose, although I can see where repetition in prose concerning meth users could serve a useful purpose.

After that set of tales, the author’s use of language generally tightens up, and an outline of a project begins to glimmer though the blood and the bodies. It seems like Mr. Bill is looking at the body of American Appalachian folklore, very definitely including the amazing American murder ballad tradition, as a sort of foundation for the stories he’s creating.

One of these tales features the murder of a spurned lover literally in the waters of a river, which is of course one of the great wellsprings of these murder ballads.

The initial trilogy of tales concerning feuding hill clans is an old trope in American fiction and beyond, of course. It looks to me as if he pulled back from writing about the mythical hillbilly other to write about experiences that are closer to a livable, reportable experience – a good two-thirds of the stories in the book, I estimate, include viewpoints alongside law enforcement personnel.

Toward the end of the book, he reintroduces some of the characters from the clans at the start of the book and looks to be working his way back to them.

There is a split in the prose throughout the book. When Mr. Bill is writing about the ‘other,’ which I hasten to add may not actually be his perception of the hillbilly crankers, his use of words gets, I dunno, overenthusiastic. Confused somehow. Metaphors compressed down to literal actions, reactive verbs transformed into active verbs. When he writes about the more prosaic actions of an officer of the law, clarity comes into the writing. Thinking about this, I wondered if that reflected reportage versus imagination or memory, and I think that’s a reasonable thesis.

On his blog, he’s recently posted links to a spot of autobiography, in We Brought Tomorrow Until Today Was Gone, and to the Granta-published online-only The Heartland: Ten Years After 9/11, which is reportage. In the autobio, there are recongnizable antecedents to characters seen in Crimes in Southern Indiana.

One last note: MFT member and Southern Indiana songwriter John Terrill, Bloomington author Bill Weaver, and New Orleans based DJ and guitarist Matt Uhlmann are all from Lawrenceburg, Indiana, which is on the northern bank of the Ohio. All three have close ties to the music scenes that spawned MFT. I was curious if Mr. Bill’s settings or life experiences might have crossed ways with these guys, but apart from Mr. Bill’s mother being named Sue Weaver, it seems unlikely.

Mr. Terrill may share a sensibility with Mr. Bill, though, as evidenced by this Rosebloods track, Whiskey River. I couldn’t figure out how to embed the song here for one-click play, my apologies.

Bread

Long, detailed dream in which I worked on a batch of no-knead bread, but got distracted and forgot to let the dough rise.

Then, on preheating the oven and dutch oven, for some reason I rolled the dough out into a baguette shape and cut slices, which I then distributed around on the bare oven rack and on the inverted lid of the dutch oven.

Sometime later, smoke pouring from the oven, I opened the door and saw the carnage. Not all the bread was wrecked, oddly. I remember thinking, ah, some of this will make great breadcrumbs once I scrape the carbon off.

Well then.

Geez, a whole day spent on a mandatory security upgrade. At least I finally got the comment system working again. I’m sure I will regret that.

Amazingly, nearly four years after I first looked for single-day digest capability for Twitter reposts in MT, there is still no such capacity. At least sometime between then and now the local implementation of Action Streams became functional. Sadly, that functionality is as useless now as it was then, since it eschews treating outside content as posts.

One guy, the fellow that came up with the inbound Twitter reposter MT-Twitter (not to be confused with the outbound Twitter blogpost notification plugin also called MT-Twitter) wrote a roll-his-own Action Streams to post converter but decided not to make it a plugin.

A pal sagely counseled moving to WordPress, which does have a Twitter digest plugin, but the work involved in keeping this site look makes that an unlikely eventuality.