Guestbooks, etc

No big thoughts to share today, but I did set up guestbooks for both modock.whybark.com and tussinup.whybark.com today. They use a slightly reworked version of Thorsten Schmidt’s PHP Guestbook.

Unfortunately, the default config lacked a datestamp, so I might throw on my overalls and start monkeying with the carbs and jets. But it was taxing enough adding the appropriate UI elements. I guess If I really get down and dirty with it I should make it easier to add the UI stuff too.

Yes, yes, I’ll eventually set one up for here too – but I gotta have a clearer picture of my eventual UI goal for this site first.

April 29, 1992

octo_rk.gifTen years ago we watched LA burn. I ran from my first riot, a few dozen people who gathered outside the police station in my neighborhood and chucked a few bottles, shattering a window. Almost everybody splt when the kids with the bottles chucked ’em.

I also drew an Octogon that day. I think it’s kind of fatuous, but it’s just the sort of thing Farble would do. I think Bill wrote the strip, but, honestly I don’t remember. Click the frame to see the whole thing.

Mysteries of Life

Bloomington, Indiana is my hometown. I lived there from 1976 until 1982, and from 1983 until 1990. I graduated both high school and college in Bloomington. In high school and college I was deeply involved in the local music scene, specifically the punk scene. I had friends that played all kinds of music, though, and as I’ve gotten less mercilessly arrogant about what’s good and what’s not my tastes have broadened quite a bit. Whether or not that means I now like pablum is left as an excercise for the reader.

I spent the last five years playing mandolin in an irish rock band, for God’s sake, and I totally, utterly love bluegrass; either of these genres would send me shrieking from the room when I was a teenager. As a teenager, though, I never played music, really; my first band was Modock which ran for 9 months in 1989 and 1990, and I pretty much haven’t stopped playing since.

Which brings me to the subject of this entry. A surprising number of people from that period of my life have retained a professional or casual interest in making music. Among them are Jake Smith and Freda Love. Jake, Freda, and John Strohm were in Antenna together in the early nineties, and before that, John and Freda were founding members, with Juliana Hatfield and Seth White, of the Blake Babies.

Jake and Freda are married and have kids. Jake also plays with my favorite musician of all time, the criminally underappreciated Dale Lawrence of the Gizmos (v2.0) and the Vulgar Botamen. The three of them together have an indie label, No Nostalgia. I’ll do a Dale entry or two eventually, I assure you.

I first recall Jake from a band he was in while he remained in high school, “My Three Sons”; he was the bassist, and absolutely stood out as a very talented musician. He was very open to the antics which we engaged in in that scene, and I recall in particular a five-or-six-person one-off performance by a band consisting entirely of basses. He went on to gigs with the Nids and perhaps other bands, while I think, attending IU. Knowledgeable corrections are welcome.

At any rate, the music that Jake and Freda have made on these three discs (in order from oldest to most recent: “Keep a Secret”, “Come Clean”, and “Distant Relative”) is so good it makes my teeth hurt. The images in this entry link to Amazon for your purchasing convenience, although I’m not getting a cut from Amazon simply because I’m a very lazy man.

My personal favorite of these three discs is “Come Clean”, whch was a major label release on RCA; apprently there were the usual personnel shuffles at the label just after the record came out, and it was never properly flacked, which hurt sales, which led to the band leaving the label. If you have any interest in contemporary music at all, you’ve heard this story a million times.

The music itself is sparely arranged indie-pop, which reflects the midwestern music scene of my youth. In thinking about the sound that emerged from early-eighties punk, new wave, and no wave in the midwest, it’s strange to realize that the music is in fact reflective of what could fairly be described as a midwestern heritage in American music. It’s difficult to put a finger on, but bluegrass, Hoagy Carmichael, John Mellencamp, the Zero Boys, the Vulgar Boatmen, and the Mysteries of Life share an aesthetic which I’m still struggling to describe.

It’s got to do with internalization and limits, I think.

“Stardust” is clearly an individual’s meditation on their environment. Honestly, to me it sounds just like an early-winter evening snowfall along Indiana Avenue by Dunn Wood in Bloomington, directly across the street from the Book Nook in which, legend has it, Hoagy composed the tune. Big, fat, feathery flakes float through the cool dusk air against the brilliance of fall color to smack softly against the sidewalk. A few students hustle along the street to eat eat a sub or buy a record. Woodsmoke and wet leaves linger in the nostril.

(Update: I just remembered that there’s actually another piece called “Snowfall” which is similar in texture and tone to “Stardust” but written by pianist and bandleader Claude Thornhill. Could be my impressions of “Stardust” are derived from “Snowfall”; or maybe Thornhill was thinking of the same things I did when he wrote it. Interestingly, Thornhill’s from Terre Haute, Indiana, and was born in 1909, ten years later than Hoagy.)

Bluegrass is about retooling the most conservative aspects of our musical heritage for use in a modern world via mythmaking about that lost past, a desperate, anxious clutching colored by aggression. That blazing mandolin expresses violence as well as mastery.

Mellencamp’s small-town anthems incorporate some of the views of the defiant, self-defeating rednecks who beat the shit out of me when I was in high school. Fists pumping in the air or on my face, their fearful pride expressed a fear of change, of the outside world altering their familiar landscape of hills, trucks, and Molly Hatchet tunes.

Allow me to clarify that I don’t think the music of Bill Monroe or John Mellencamp is unreflective or badly made; far from it, it’s carefully made music that reflects the artist’s ambitions. What musican doesn’t know that one of their functions is to speak eloquently for the listener?

Mysteries of Life use traditionalist music-making strategies – guitar, bass, drums, and vocal harmonies – to explore self-imposed boundaries of another sort, those within relationships. The songs use physical place and phenomena to express the singer’s emotional point of view: “Rain on the window rolls away, and each drop weighs a ton” (“Come Clean”); “All of the regulars moving away – and I see Maya and Luna waving to me … Maya and Luna across the street / Ooh, the change in the tone of voice; Ooh, did I ever have a choice” (“Maya & Luna”).

These boundaries, a kind of midwestern fatalism, are also present in Dale’s music, especially in the Vulgar Boatmen’s work. I’ll save a detailed discussion of that for my eventual Dale Lawrence entry.

Jake and Freda’s sonic pictures of my hometown are like a visit home for me; the indivdual characters drawn in the songs are not necessarily indivduals that I know personally or specifically, but more like expressions of recognizable characteristics of the people I came of age among, and will naturally love as family until I pass from this world. Additionally, I associate individual songs with specific physical locations and atmospheres in Bloomington: for example, “Hey Kate” is a walk along near-to-downtown South Washington street on a spring afternoon.

I was very happy to see John and Freda when the Blake Babies played here in Seattle not too long ago. What with kids and all, I doubt that there’s much chance of seeing the Mysteries (or for that matter the Boatmen) here soon, but I sure hope I get the chance. Go buy their records.

Got Wiki?

Those of you who speak techie will probably already have heard of wiki, a relatively recent innovation web-publishing technology. Those of you who do not, bear with me for a moment – I think you’ll be intrigued.

Wiki is a way of publishing content on the web which both simplifies the process – similar to the way a blogging app does – and makes the published content immediately available for annotation or editing by anyone in the audience.

A wiki author may chose to activate or design levels of access, naturally. However, it’s not been common yet to create layered editing privileges among wiki users. http://c2.com/cgi/wiki is the site of the original team that developed wiki.

As is the case with all things computerly, early adopters of this publishing approach tended to be computer progammers and their ilk; wiki is obviously immediately attractive in a distributed collaborative environment, such as an open-source software development project. It’s looking like wiki will become the standard way of creating process and progress documentation for such projects.

My friend Chris Dent is one of many creators of wiki variations, which emulate the fundamental features of wiki but which add to or alter that feature set in intriguing, creative ways. Chris’s implementation of wiki is called warp, and its’ distinct functionality is that where wiki enables you to edit content or add a link to a new page, Chris’s system primarily asks you to contribute definitions of individual words within the warp space.

Once you’ve added a definition, every appearance of that word in the warp database links to that definition.

Here’s Chris’ original warp, SLISWarp; and here is the public warp he offers to the world, GlobalWarp. Chris has kindly set up a wiki for a projcet I keep meaning to do, which is essentially wikiwarping Jason Webley’s lyrics. I’ll get there eventually.

Other people in the world are also doing cool things with wiki. Here’s the inevitable collaborative encyclopedia project: http://www.wikipedia.com/, the Know-How Wiki, and the Flash Coders Wiki.

I suspect that we’ll see the addition of XML-based data-portal hooks to wiki-hosting environments soon, such that the wiki administrator could set their wiki to automagically adopt the linksets generated by, for example, Chris’ warps, or the wikipedia. My buddy Adam thinks that there’s a possible industry in wikihosting. He may be right.

I think that in order for wikis to move to the next stage of popular adoption, several hurdles must be cleared.

  1. simplification of installation; provision of support for installation
  2. the addition of security and authorial privilege layers
  3. base-wide linking of terms a la Warp while retaining page and topic linking a la Wiki
  4. a visible commercial success built around Wiki-style interactive authoring
  5. XML data-pass as mentioned above

Start your thinking caps!

Swiss wines

I lived in Switzerland for about a year when I was sixteen. I attended a french-language high school (probably acually a Lyceum, but I’ll have to look it up) called L’École Nouvelle de la Suisse Romande (roughly, “The New School of Romance Switzerland”). La Suisse Romande is a geographical subsection of Switzerland that may be understood, if vaguely, to mean “the non-german-speaking parts”; that’s pretty much the southern edge of the country.

While there, I learned to speak French, sorta, and got a taste for Swiss cuisine. Yes, yes, Swiss cuisine is like German food with really good cheese, but there’s more to it. There are really stinky sweetmeat-and-cabbage sausages called “saucissons” for example; and then there’s the wine they grow around Lake Geneva (“Lac Léman”), the body of water on which Lausanne is situated.

This wine is the wine around which my palate for wine formed, and all other wines are tasted in relation to it, at a pre-analytic level. This is despite my father’s best efforts to inculcate a well-formed palate on my part. He’s a winemaker of really long standing (his first batches were bottled around the time I was two, unless there are some even earlier vintages of which I’m unaware) and he’s damn good at it.

Now, let me clarify a bit: I know about wines, to an extent, and can taste wine with reasonable depth. I enjoy all sorts of wine. In fact, of late, my taste is moving toward sweeter wines, such as Reislings and the like. What I know about wine, and my long-standing interest in it, is due to the good offices of my father. Thanks, Pops!

However, because the Swiss wines grown near Lausanne are both rare enough (the Swiss don’t export the wine, by and large) and deeply-seated enough in my mind, these wines have the capacity to, quite literally, move me to tears when I have the good fortune to encounter them.

On Wednesday I was strolling through the aisles of one of our ever-multiplying neighborhood grocery stores when I saw the wines I have included photos of here. “Hm”, thought I, “a white cross on a red field. Hunh, that’s similar to the SWISS FLAG! Could these wines be from near Lausanne?”

So I bought one.

I opened it as soon as I got home to taste it, and, as Emeril sez, BAM!

As it turns out, the white cross on a red shield is the emblem of the Savoys, who had some sort of political sway in Switzerland for a period of time. The French département of Savoy is, in fact, the part of France right across the lake from Lausanne. These wines are really as close as I can reasonably expect to get to vins Vaudois or Valaisienne.

Especially as close as I can reasonably expect to find by walking around at random in the neighborhood.

All roads lead to Rome, I guess. Who’s the tribune this annum?

The Daily Show (with, um, that little guy from MTV)

txt_173x095_thedailyshow.gifBy now, the entire world is aware that Comedy Central’s Daily Show provided the only decent coverage of the 2000 election debacle. They called the outcome of the race a full 9 months before the election. They were the only media outfit which bothered to give any air time at all to the Greens. They nailed Arizona Senator John McCain with questions he couldn’t answer.

In short, they displayed the appropriate attitude of skeptical irreverence that a democracy requires from its’ journalists. What does it indicate for the health of an empire when it’s only the jester that questions the king?

steve_carell_milk_200.jpgThey went on to a kick-ass ride right up until September 11th, went off the air, and spent a few disoriented weeks covering the war, the contraction of civil liberties, and the like. This period was not the strongest in the show’s history – self-consciously acting as the only place you could see Ralph Nader on TV, devoting twenty minutes of the show to foreign policy analysis by beltway types, and so forth. Then ABC announced they were giving Koppel the boot, which pretty much guaranteed Mr. Stewart a shot at the big time on late night network TV, and you could tell that there was a lot of uncertainty on the show.

Once ABC confirmed that they were not gonna turn Koppel out on his ass, the show began to regain some focus, and is beginning to exhibit the combination of sharp-tongued wit and intellectual honesty (cleverly disguised as outright lies) which made it the only decent news source in the entire blighted wasteland of contemporary American media for the last 9 months of 2000.

During the campaign coverage and the first half of 2001, the Steven-Stephen combination gave the show a kind of manic power that is better than gold in TV comedy. Stephen Colbert’s collected and urbane satire and Steven Carells’ eye-bulging, flop-sweating freaky egocentric misanthrope was anchored by Stewart’s genius of delivery and hosting interaction (I don’t think I can call it interviewing, exactly) and the results were killer.

However, ever since the premiere of the FedEx campaign that featured Carell (which I’ve not seen on air lately), Carell’s presence on the show has been quite diminished. Naturally, reasons for screen time are not given in the show; I made a half-hearted effort find an obsessed fansite that would provide stalker-worthy inside poop, but came up dry. I did find the excellent Daily Show site at Comedy Central, and additionally, the video-heavy fansite “the Daily Show Experience”, both linked below.

120x60_sms_girls.gifSo, like, where the Hell is Steve Carell? Everyone, together this time: Where the Hell is Steve Carell? Please take the graphic above and disseminate it widely.

A footnote: the square graphic of a cell-phone’s text-message screen was on the Comedy Central site in the context of an ad for a major wireless provider. Someone should clue them in: we’ve had two major, uh, train-wrecks in the last seven days or so.

In poking about for this entry I found these sites of note:

the Daily Show Experience, which has tons of classic clips, including the original John McCain interview, but which, sadly, has not been updated a whole bunch of late.

Comedy Central’s official site

Manhattan Research Inc.

As Spencer is wont to do, he made my musical day at Saturday’s dinner by bringing out a couple of discs that I’d known about for quite some time but never located because of incomplete knowledge concerning the records. This entry is about the later work of Raymond Scott on the disc set titled
“Manhattan Research, Inc”
, the eccentric composer whose work is best known as the quirky, high-energy soundtrack to a number of Warner Brothers cartoons. I’ll just assure you that you’ve heard his work and let you dig up the details if you’re interested.

Beginning in the late forties, Scott began to explore the possibilities for compostion and performance available by mechanical and electronic means. Apparently, he was frequently frustrated by what he perceived as individualistic execution of his arrangements by the musicians, arrangers, and recording engineers he worked with as a successful composer of pop and advertising music. His solution? Build machines that he could control directly.

A great deal of this charming and often incredible music has been re-issued by
Basta in collaboration with the Raymond Scott Archives. The disc under discussion collects material recorded by Scott for primarily commercial use, and I personally have a deep fondness for “IBM MT/ST: The Paperwork Explosion”, which is a four-and-a-half minute commercial for an early IBM word processor. Scott intermingles futuristic beeps with actor’s voices stiffly repeating simple lines such as “In the past, there always seemed to be enough time to do the paperwork” to convey the idea that effecive use of the IBM device would create sufficient time for knowledge workers to, well, think.

This stuff is priceless, and Scott helped to shape our aural ideas of what the future once sounded like. Listening to it is like running into an old acquaintance.

ENRON: Skilling "agitated"

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/24/business/24ENRO.html

“When shown records that laid out the details of the financial returns during his testimony several months ago before the S.E.C., Mr. Skilling was said to have grown agitated as he described his opinion of the information. Had he known the magnitude of the profits, Mr. Skilling was said to have told the regulators, he would have immediately summoned Enron executives involved in the dealings and given them 24 hours to justify such outsize results.”

WhhaAATTT! Why, THESE PROFITS are an OUTRAGE! EXPLAIN YOURSELVES or face the WRATH of… KENNY BOY!

After all, that’s what CEOs do, right? Call employees on the carpet for reporting absurdly high ROI? Yup, that’s why they make the big bucks.

Spence on Méliès

Spence added a comment to my bit on Méliès that is both long enough and interesting enough to merit promotion to a full fledged entry. Take it away, Spencer!

“Actually, I’m fairly certain the print of “Conquest of the North Pole” is complete. Most of Melies’ films have fairly choppy narratives. When he got started at the turn of the (last) century, this wasn’t a big deal — in fact, in many ways he was ahead of the game. For example, contrast his 1902 magnum opus “A Trip to the Moon” (“La Voyage dans La Lune”) with other films of the same period — on the whole, cinema of the period was only just moving beyond the “actualities” (static shots without edits of street scenes and other real-life views, typically lasting perhaps a minute or two). Not only was La Lune practically an epic at some 20 min., it had an actual narrative and editing — the much-ballyhooed narrative breakthrough film, “The Great Train Robbery,” would not be made for another 2 years. (Indeed, Melies was making narrative films — albeit phantastical ones — two to four years prior, earlier than almost any other filmmaker that I’m aware of.) And not to mention, of course, the special effects that remained cutting edge for at least another 10-20 years.

Alas, Melies the auteur did not evolve much beyond the simple trick film. “Conquest of the North Pole” (1916) is really not very dissimilar from his works of 15 years prior. By this time, of course, cinema had evolved considerably in terms of editing, storytelling, and camera placement. After all, the year prior had scene the release of D.W. Griffith’s monumental (albeit racist) “Birth of a Nation”; even his fantasy film cache was slipping as early versions of “Der Golem” and other phatasticals were being produced by numerous others. Meanwhile, Melies was still relying on his stagey, proscenium-style staging and eschewing cross-cutting.

The result? Melies became increasingly passé, fewer tickets sold, and fewer distributers could give a damn. In 1915, Melies had to sell his own theater. By 1917 or so, he was completely out of the game and effectively vanished like one of his own fantasy creatures. Legend has it that he resurfaced ca. 1938 when someone spotted him selling toys in a Paris market. The story goes that he had no idea that he was remembered at all, and was unaware of the crucial impact he’d had on cinema. Like so many important geniuses, he died penniless.”

You can go here or here to find out more interesting things from Mr. Sundell.