Drummond & Son

current_cover.jpgDrummond & Son, in the October 7 ish of the New Yorker, spins a sodden tale of my town, and I thought it was nailed. The geography is right, for example; and while Mr. D’Ambrosio locates his typewriter shop in Belltown, there was just such a shop about four blocks from where I live, that’s now become a fine drinking establishment specializing in European beers.

I read the story in my living room, on the couch, as a fine fall rainstorm lowered our famous clouds above, a down comforter. I should have shouldered into a tweed and stepped outside, just to get the smell right as I read.

While I did not note any specific pop-culture clues to the time-setting of the story, I’d guess it was just about the time I moved here or a couple of years after. The city felt like the story feels – isolate, wet, distant, a reserved neighborliness – even chilliness – in the place of the yammering aggression that fuels most American cities.

If our recession stays the course, that’s something that might return, I hope. I liked it here then. I liked the fact that buses were expected to be a part of the middle-class landscape and that poets and musicians could bump into one another in used book stores. Maybe that city’s still out there.

Our air is noticeably fouler now than it was five years ago. As I’ve written here before, our governmental apparatus is in a state of paralysis, preferring to close libraries and launch smear campagns at various wings of themeselves than to support good ideas and execute them well in the public interest. Perhaps that listless stupidity is, as the story implies, Seattle’s child. I hope not.

Mr. D’Ambrosio is interviewed here. Oh, look. A quote:

“Writing about the Pacific Northwest is a funny phenomenon, particularly being from Seattle. The Seattle that I have an allegiance to was a desperately unhappy place. It’s not the Seattle that over the last ten years has evolved to become a place that, at least in the States, has a kind of national prominence. Particularly grunge music has focused attention on the place. It’s really the Seattle of the 70’s that I grew up in which had the highest unemployment rate in the country; it was a dump. There was a big sign above the freeway saying, “Will the last person leaving Seattle please turn out the lights.” People were leaving in droves. Boeing [airplane manufacturer] had laid off a huge amount of people and the real estate market was totally depressed. Nothing was going on. And that’s the city that I actually still look for in a way, even though it has become hidden by the coffee shops. ”

UPDATE, Father’s Day, 2016. Fixed bitrotted NYer link.

The Pirate Hunter

zacks.jpg The Pirate Hunter: The True Story of Capatin Kidd by Robert Zacks. ISBN: 0786865334.

Zacks is also the author of “An Underground Education”, kind of contrarian trivia book that I had read and pretty much forgotten about – one of those mind-candy trivia books that includes details about inessential but interesting bits of historical trivia such as the role that Edison’s dirty marketing played in establishing electrocution as a means of capital punishment. The subtext to that book, in line with my extant belief systems, is that the powerful and wealthy play dirty and for keeps. (So do the rest of us, but when you’re powerful or wealthy such behavior inevitably kills people – the rest of us don’t always murder, just frequently.)

“The Pirate Hunter” continues this theme. Zacks paints a picture of William Kidd that is unmistakably sympathetic. Kidd, a Scot who settled in early New York and distinguished himself in a naval militia of sorts during a conflict in the Caribbean defending British colonial interests, had parlayed that success into a career as a well-to-do merchant in New York City. He’d married the most beautiful girl in town, helped in the construction of the original Trinity Church building at Wall and Broadway (yes, that church, although the building presently on site was built in the 1850s), and generally had made an important man of himself.

Alas for him, the sea and danger called, and he shipped out to London with some idea of obtaining a Royal Navy Captain’s commission in order to fight the dirty French on the bounding main. At that time, however (the 1690s), you had to be a member of the nobility to be an officer in the British military, so he struck out.

A shady acquaintance from NYC, who had connections to influential members of the King’s court, hooked up with Kidd, and concocted a scheme whereby Kidd would be granted an unconventional privateer’s license to pursue pirates. A privateer was a means of inexpensively extending a nation’s military power – something like a bounty hunter. Privateers were granted licenses that allowed them to act as agents of military interdiction against specific nationalities, in time of war, or pirates, in time of peace. These licenses generally required the privateers to capture the target and then immediately turn the prize over to the justice system of the day, where the captured goods would be parceled out to interested parties, including, in the case of piracy, the original owners of the pirated goods.

Kidd’s license, however, was distinct from the run-of-the-mill licenses in that it was backed directly by the King, rather than by the Navy, a colonial government, or a colonial corporation such as the East india Company. The theoretical advantage was that the goods which Kidd seized did not have to be turned over to the appropriate system of adjudication but were regarded as under the direct control of His Majesty, King William. Given that state of affairs, the King could then assign the goods directly to the backers of the mission.

The license turned Kidd into the equivalent of our contemporary drug-interdiction units, who are empowered to confiscate and impound property in association with drug-seizures whether or not there is a conviction in the case. Kidd’s backers stood to profit in direct proportion to the success of the pirates caught.

However, things did not go as planned. Kidd had ill luck finding legitimate prizes, and his penurious backers had refused to allow him to pay wages to his crew, insisting instead that they could only be paid from proceeds of the voyage – much like pirate practice, in fact. With this restriction in place, Kidd had a tough time getting any crew but former pirates, and as soon as it was apparent the mission was in trouble, the crew began to agitate to turn pirate.

Kidd apparently resisted this strongly, and at one point in the voyage, most of his crew left in order to pursue piracy, with greater succes than Kidd had at privateering. In the end, Kidd took two ships under the rules of his license, but because of a number of unfortunate events, he’d already become the poster boy for notorious piracy on the high seas – not the least of these was the fact that Kidd’s royally-derived grant had become known in Parlaiment and was seized upon as a means of weaking the royalist party.

In the end, of course, it was in the political interests of the King and colonial powers to make a great example of this man, whose legend, even before his death, had made his name synonymous with black-hearted teachery and greedy adventure. In the end he was hung, and his body was placed in an iron cage at the edge of the Thames, and left on display for nearly 100 years, as a lesson to those who would turn against the Crown, and now, as a lesson to those who would deal with merciless and corrupt forces that far outweigh them.

This is the best pirate history book I have ever read. Zack’s detailed research and clear, unornamented writing allow the complex story to emerge clearly. One gets a distinct sense of the fascination and joy with which Zacks waded through the crabbed, blurred handwriting of his primary source material; as his immersion in the documents increased, his ability to discern, or project, personality into the inky traces left by our ancestors increased, and I came away from the book with a vivid sense of the personalities of many of the players in the book. Zack’s dry, ironic wit helped him, as well, to isolate details which throw his story into relief; and in the book’s closing scenes, as William Kidd is brought to the gallows through the teeming, stinking streets of a Londaon execution day festival, he brings life to his grotesques via vivid, echoing sensory description that brough to mind Borges, Hogarth, and Breughel.

An excellent, satisfying read. Arr!

Sky Ships, a review

Sky Ships, a history of the airship in the United States Navy, published 1990 by Pacifica Press. By William Althoff, 304 pp.

Out of print. Buy it from the NAS Lakehurst gift shop online or used from Amazon. Here’s an excerpt concerning the consruction of the Shenandoah at NAS Lakehurst, New Jersey.

Finally, it should be noted that Lakehurst is open for tours. If you live in New Jersey, you may want to visit (you know who you are).

I picked this book up in late summer 2000 at the Tillamook Air Museum, in Tillamook, Oregon, on the Oregon coast, an air museum housed in the surviving hangar of a former Navy blimp station (or NAS, Naval Air Station). If you’re a Nova watcher, like me, you may recall a Nova (entited “the Blimp is Back”) on blimps and alternative flight technology shot around 1991 in which a home-made rack of surplus Huey helicopters, all welded together, falls apart explosively on the airstrip, and later features an impossibly large building burning.

That building was the other hangar at Tillamook NAS. The buildings are huge, impossibly large. They have many interesting airplanes, and yet, the museum feels homey and small. It’s definitely worth a visit if you ever hit the fantastically beautiful, and gratifyingly remote and isolated, Oregon coast. Portland dwellers, just drive west for an hour. Everyone else, buckle up.

The book itself is a fanatically detailed history of United States naval lighter-than-air aviation. The program began during world war one, but only began to see actual flight after the end of the war, with a British airship and the United States designed and built Shenandoah. There were also some soft-bag airships imported from the British, known as the B-type, which were effectively wingless American biplane fuselages slung under gasbags. Alas, I could find no images on the net of this incredble bit of jury-rig engineering.

You know, we have a car we’re not using, and, I bet we could, like, um, soak, like, sheets in some, um, rubber cement, and um… unh, what? Oh, sorry, I, uh, drifted off there.

UPDATE: I was mistaken, somewhat, in characterizing the Shenandoah as United States designed – she was actually built using plans developed in Germany by the Zeppelin operation, and can be considered the direct forerunner of the great zeps we think of most commonly when the subject comes up, namely the Hindenburg and the Graf Zeppelin. She can be immediately recognized in photographs by her streamlined control fins; all the later ships employed more blockily shaped fins in order to increase control-surface area. She’s clearly the ship seen on the cover of Sky Ships in today’s graphic.

Sigh. And an update to the update. first, the cover of Sky Ships actually shows the Los Angeles, built in Germany by the Zeppelin company for the Navy immediately after the end of the war. The image is in fact of her coming into port at Lakehurst for the first time; Dr. Eckener is in command of the ship. The Shenandoah was in fact reverse-engineered from a zep brougt down over England, but was indeed built in the United States. A diagnostic distinction between Shenandoah and Los Angeles is the externally mounted control car of the Shenandoah.

The most surprising thing I gleaned from the book was the detailed internal politics of the US Navy from the end of World War One through the 1960’s, when the LTA program was halted. The author spares no detail in recounting the byzantine posturings of the various service departments and interest groups as they jockey for position and for their share of the ever-growing, ever-more-astoundingly-huge defense budget of the United States of America.

Unfortunately, from the author’s perspective, and, I suppose, from mine, LTA was a consistent loser in these lobbyist’s wars. I believe that the author’s intent in detailing the politicality of military budgeting is the soldier’s intent in the oft-heard complaint “I’m a soldier, not a politician”.

Naturally, such a statement, although fervently subscribed to by the utterer, is at best a misrepresentation of the facts, and persistently creates difficulty in public discourse concerning the military. It’s my opinion that it’s an effective defensive tactic deployed in democratic combat, and in point of fact, my reading of this book supports that view.

Nonetheless I found it fascinating, rather than a dirty shame. If military budgets are easily documentable as the result of political processes, then, the development of these budgets can and should be completely open to the public as all political processes should be in a democracy. The fact that much of the politicality of the process is documentable is in and of itself reason to toast our democracy and her traditions.

However, one of the most important tactical determinants of the political defeats of the naval LTA program is clearly the repeated loss, in the dramatic airship wrecks of the Shenandoah, Akron, and Macon (as I recall), of the senior airship brass within the Navy. If the most committed admirals died in peacetime as the consequence of the difficulty of safely operating a small number of large, rigid-construction lighter-than-air ships, one might reasonably conclude that ambitous younger leaders might prefer to explore such technology as, oh, the aircraft carrier.

Indeed, one of the lessons I drew from the book was that the reason we lack those fabled queens of the sky today is not due to the dim vision of evil bureaucrats, or due to the horrible, lingering publicity of the loss of the Hindenburg. It’s physics.

Something that big, which moves slowly, has negative bouyancy, and retains the mass of any object the size of two football fields, is, first, hard to control, and second, at the mercy of, well, everything.

After the Los Angeles, the last of the great American dirigibles and the only one not lost in amazing wrecks (stay tuned for a piece on the wreck of the Shenandoah in Ohio!), the Navy refocused the program on smaller, soft-bag vessels, which operated successfully thoughout World War Two as convoy escort scouts. These vessels are the direct ancestor of today’s Goodyear blimp, and in some cases are still in service with the Goodyear company. Goodyear, naturally, prays before candles nightly that a military LTA program will rise from the dead. In point of fact, their candles may be well burnt, if they know how to speak Boeingese.

At the tail end of the program in the early sixties, a new technology was emerging which tied a large, rigid keel to ever-larger soft lifting bodies. Within the lifting body itself? A long-range radar station. These ships were designed for high-altitude, near continuous service, something like a high-altitude geosynchronus satellite, but, duh, within the atmoshpere.

As noted earlier, Boeing and Cargolifter have just announced a partnership. One of the proposed uses? Long-range high-altitude surveillance.

Stay tuned! It’s BLIMP WEEK!

Gene Wolfe, part two

After the “Book of the New Sun”, Wolfe went on to write many other books, including the undeservedly obscure “Soldier of the Mist” and “Soldier of Arete“, historically rigorous novels of a wandering mercenary in Greece at the time of the wars recounted in Homer. The soldier, who is nameless, has the same brain problem that the Guy Pearce character had in “Memento”, and keeps track of events in the world by keeping a journal.

These books reawakened my interest in classical culture and led me to read a great deal more about Greek and Roman history, and in the end to a deep appreciation of the surviving Greek plays, literature, and philosophy. A year or two ago Viv and I saw a fantastic production of the Odyssey, as a play, which KICKED my ASS! I laughed, I cried: it was a gift from God. I certainly would never have been interested if not for these books.

]]> Read more

Gene Wolfe, part one

I’ve been reading entire oeuvres lately, preferably in order of publication, and am currently taking a break from the incredibly prolific (and just hospitalized) Michael Moorcock by rereading Gene Wolfe‘s work. I first read Wolfe in the mid-eighties as his masterwork, the four-volume “Book of the New Sun” was coming out.

The tetralogy is highly influenced by the work of Jorge Luis Borges, the magisterial Argentinian fantasist. It also draws from a little-noted SF trend of the mid-to-late seventies. Many literarily ambitious SF authors wrote pastiches of pre-industrial novels, borrowing the language and rhetorical devices of late-eighteenth century European literature.

]]> Read more

Smithsonian, April 2002

Lovely Lincoln portrait cover.

My faves in the mag were the extremely cool photos by Edward Burtynsky of shipbreaking in India – the scale of the fragments of the ships, and their worn quality, reminds me very strongly of SF art that impressed me as a child.

These images seemed to point out to me that what is really interesting in SF is the intersection of technology and human, the amazing and dangerous juxtapositions that come from this. It’s as though someone had grounded not an oil tanker on the shores of the Indian subcontintent, but an interstellar freighter.

]]> Read more

the New Yorker, March 25, 2002

I really enjoyed the illustration for Malcolm Gladwell’s review of “The Myth of the Paperless Office” on page 92. I enjoyed the article itself, of course, which is a reflection on messiness in the workspace as an organizing principle. Both the review and the illustration appear to reflect the ideas of David Gelernter, CS guy at Yale, victim of the Unabomber and the author of the pretty great “1939: The Lost World of the Fair”.

Piles, it seems, are actually a really efficient way of organizing information.

Although a piler, I’m not so sure I agree. But then, as with much of Gelernter’s work, I see lots of things I agree with but don’t necessarily reach the same conclusion.

]]> Read more